[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets.
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:40:39 +0100 |
Hi Reinier,
> > Yes, but it's an idiomatic one, oft suggested; "Unpack and run
> > `./configure && make all check install'".
>
> I don't get it. What is wrong with
>
> make -sj clean; make -sj all; make -sj check; make -sj install
That doesn't do the same thing; `make all check install' stops if one
of the targets fails to build, not proceeding to the next. You have to
replace the `;' with `&&' in your version to achieve the same with the
shell. (I pointed this out in my original email to the list.)
To repeat, `./configure && make all check install' is standard usage;
-j breaks this. It would be nice if there was a simple way to achieve
parallelism only within the build of each of the argv[] targets, not
across them.
Cheers, Ralph.
- Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/23
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Paul Smith, 2014/08/23
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/24
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Reinier Post, 2014/08/25
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets.,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Reinier Post, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., dprovan, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/27