[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets.
From: |
Reinier Post |
Subject: |
Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets. |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:11:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun Aug 24 12:33:41 2014, address@hidden (Ralph Corderoy) wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> > > It seems a design flaw that I must
> > >
> > > make -sj clean && make -sj all && make -sj check &&
> > > make -sj install
> >
> > Well, that's because you're only considering this use-case,
>
> Yes, but it's an idiomatic one, oft suggested; "Unpack and run
> `./configure && make all check install'".
>
> > But, if you consider something like:
> >
> > make prog1 prog2 prog3 prog4
> >
> > then it's clearly a design flaw if these programs are built serially.
>
> Oh sure, I wasn't trying to suggest that it's never wanted, just that
> the binary -j doesn't seem sufficient to cover common cases.
I don't get it. What is wrong with
make -sj clean; make -sj all; make -sj check; make -sj install
??
> > There is no easy way to do this in GNU make today.
I don't see this as a convincing use case.
--
Reinier Post
- Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/23
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Paul Smith, 2014/08/23
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/24
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets.,
Reinier Post <=
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/25
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Reinier Post, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Eli Zaretskii, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., dprovan, 2014/08/26
- Re: Parallel Build, but Not for the Command-Line Targets., Ralph Corderoy, 2014/08/27