Re: libtool 1.6 should provide support for A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL

[Scott James Remnant]

On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 02:02 +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:

> Hi Scott,
> 
> * Scott James Remnant <address@hidden> [2004-05-13 01:45:55]:
> > On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 23:30 +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> > 
> > > It seems that LC_INIT has replaced A[CM]_PROG_LIBTOOL in libtool 1.6. I
> > > suggest that libtool only deprecated these options and still provide
> > > backwards compatability support.
> > > 
> > It does...
> > 
> > If it's not working, there's a bug somewhere; have you got an example
> > configure.ac that fails?
> 
> Here's my autogen.sh:
> 
>     #!/bin/sh
> 
>     # build it all
>     libtoolize --copy --force && \
>     aclocal $ACLOCAL_FLAGS && \
>     autoheader && \
>     automake --include-deps --add-missing --copy && \
>     autoconf
> 
>     # in case automake generated errors
>     autoconf
> 
> And here's some test runs:
> 
What happens if you run autogen as "ACLOCAL_FLAGS=-I. ./autogen.sh" ?

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part