Re: [Bug-gnubg] GNOMEify the user interface?

[Michael Petch]

Yes, you are correct. And it shows how much QT development targeting
Windows I do (I thought that with QT2 there was a free Windows version)
- QT3 there sure is not).  You either have to purchase the Professional
or Enterprise version which will run around $2000 and up.

The reason I thought that there was a QT-Free on Windows was that at one
time there was a KDE 2.x port (Based on QT) using Cygwin on Windows.

And that alone is QT killer - since the Windows users probably far
exceed users on other platforms (I have never seen any statistics but
based on the people I know who use it - that would be true).



On Fri, 2004-05-07 at 03:07, Martin Janke wrote:
> The following message was sent by Michael Petch <address@hidden> on Fri, 07 
> May 2004 00:19:04 -0600.
> 
> > > 
> > The QT-Free product is fully GPL compliant. One must only look at the
> > KDE project. Large scale QT development for a very large number of
> > projects across a multitude of platforms. I personally do not believe
> > this an issue.
> > 
> 
> AFAIK only the X11 and Mac versions ot the current QT is GPLed. The MS 
> Windows version is only sold under a commercial license. So to compile a 
> Windows build without X11 of gnubg one would have to buy QT for Windows ( 
> 1550,- USD). 
> 
> /Martin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
-- 
Mike Petch
CApp::Sysware Consulting Ltd.
Suite 1002,1140-15th Ave SW.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
T2R 1K6.
(403)804-5700.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part