Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Re: Scientific Quoting

[Tom Chance]

Klaus,

We realise the importance of issues like notation.
There was a lot of discussion about importing LaTeX
and MathML files for scientific and mathematical
notation, but the issue got sidetracked as we needed
to sort out more pressing issues like server problems
first.

If you would like to develop, help develop, or suggest
ideas for scientific quoting, please join in
discussions on our list.

Tom Chance


--- Klaus-Juergen Wolf <address@hidden>
wrote: > Dear Tom,
> 
> thank you for your reply.
> 
> > We haven't worked out any areas for notation etc.
> as
> > yet. Working out things like that is a tough
> issue,
> > and one I'm sure we'll cross many times.
> 
> Hm. That sounds like the whole project being a joke.
> It's quite friendly
> of guys like Mike Warren telling me I can dispose my
> articles elsewhere
> - but WHEN DO YOU *START* TO THINK ABOUT _CONTENT_?
> (Instead of
> discussing about how to produce a CVS imitation?)
> 
> Best wishes
> k.j.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia


__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/