Re: [Bug-gnupedia]Re: Scientific Quoting

[Mike Warren]

Klaus-Juergen Wolf <address@hidden> writes:

> > We haven't worked out any areas for notation etc. as yet. Working
> > out things like that is a tough issue, and one I'm sure we'll
> > cross many times.

> Hm. That sounds like the whole project being a joke. It's quite
> friendly of guys like Mike Warren telling me I can dispose my
> articles elsewhere

I don't think Nupedia is a ``disposal'' of any articles; I merely
suggested it because they are much further along in their editorial
policy and you would ``see'' your article in ``print'' much sooner.
Of course, you are obviously free to submit it to both...

> - but WHEN DO YOU *START* TO THINK ABOUT _CONTENT_?

Well, we have. TEI has pretty much been decided as the content format,
and we are hashing out the exact relationship between classification
and repository (or even if there will be a difference, as some seem to
desire).

Do you have any thoughts on the matter?

-- 
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A  0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD