Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Optional editorial pool

[Tom Chance]

I think asking for a consensus on anything is a bad
idea. Look at how long it takes us to decide on even
the most basic of matters! Articles would take forever
to verify. I think that, if chosen carefully, one
person per article would be sufficient. 

Tom


--- Imran Ghory <address@hidden> wrote: > On 20
Jan 2001, at 11:13, Tom Chance wrote:
> 
> > Who would be the editors though? I suppose people
> who
> > have written articles that are very well done, and
> to
> > start with the more eloquent of us on the project?
> 
> 
> It could be done on a mailing list basis, the
> article could be posted 
> to a mailing list it could be neatened up by anyone
> on the list, 
> posted back to the list and once there is a consesus
> that it's been 
> improved as much as possible it could be sent back
> to the author. 
> 
> Imran Ghory
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupedia mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupedia


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. 
http://auctions.yahoo.com/