[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Separating content from presentation
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Separating content from presentation |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Jan 2001 22:17:34 -0000 |
On 19 Jan 2001, at 13:59, Bob Dodd wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > "Factually correct", I think you'll have more problems with...
> > > Question (1) for 10 points: who invented the electric light bulb?
> >
> > You can cover both sides for instance see,
> >
> > http://www.uselessknowledge.com/explain/edison.shtml
> >
> > Again with the invention of Calculus most modern references
> > comment on both possible inventors.
> >
> > Imran
>
> You can certainly try, but I think you'll find that one editor's
> choice where the "balance" of the argument should lie may not be
> everyone's. How may years after the invention of the light bulb do you
> think it's taken to get a relatively dispassionate account of it? (and
> the more recent the history, the more difficult it becomes) It's why I
> keep bleating on about multiple views...
Two articles of opposing views on a topic could be just be taken by
someone independant and combined to form a balanaced view.
Imran