Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Separating content from presentation

[Imran Ghory]

On 19 Jan 2001, at 13:28, Bob Dodd wrote:

> [snip]
> > There is a difference between accepting all *reasonable* submissions
> > (i.e.  well-written, factually-correct) and accepting *all*
> > submissions. Clearly, some articles may leave out certain facts if
> > it serves the interest of her views, but others will presumably
> > write in with corrections, etcetera.  One doesn't have to accept
> > *all* submissions to accept all *views*.
> 
> "Well written?" Well... OK, but I challenge you to define "well
> written" and get the overwhelming majority to agree it :-))
> 
> "Factually correct", I think you'll have more problems with...
> Question (1) for 10 points: who invented the electric light bulb?

You can cover both sides for instance see,

http://www.uselessknowledge.com/explain/edison.shtml

Again with the invention of Calculus most modern references 
comment on both possible inventors.

Imran