[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia
From: |
Mike Warren |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia |
Date: |
19 Jan 2001 15:04:57 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
Bob Dodd <address@hidden> writes:
> > My understanding of the FDL is that such permission wouldn't be
> > needed at all; just credit would need to be given to the original
> > author for the work they did. Is this correct?
> I was think more along the lines that while the content may be
> basically OK, the Nupedia peer-review process may discover errors,
> or ask for other minor modifications (e.g. in stlye or length)
> before Nupedia could accept the entry.
Well, true, but doesn't the FDL allow for derivative (i.e. edited)
works?
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia, Tom Chance, 2001/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/19
- RE: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia, Duncan Lock, 2001/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia, Bob Dodd, 2001/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] Nupedia,
Mike Warren <=