Re: htags: status line could show better status line

[Shigio Yamaguchi]

> Maybe the end of the function/class/whatever can be approximated to the start
 of the
> next (non-nested) definition, that may be sufficient for this purpose.


I don't think so. For example,

+--------------------
|#define A(x)    (x)
|func() { return 1; }
|int     a = A(3);       <= This calling is out of func().
+--------------------

Following your method, above A(3) belongs to func() but it's wrong.
Short of information is no problem but wrong information becomes harm, I think.

> Easy - these are the references to "assert" in m4.  It would be nice to see w
hich
> function they belong to.

Sorry, I didn't understand the difference from your previous suggestion.
What should we show in the status line?
--
Shigio Yamaguchi - Tama Communications Corporation
Mail: address@hidden, (Spare mail: address@hidden)