[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?
From: |
pjodrr |
Subject: |
Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:45:52 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
Hello again,
I have to reply to my own post to correct it:
On Dec 8, 2:00 pm, pjodrr <pjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> coproc prefix_timestamp
> seq 10>&${COPROC[1]}
> eval "exec ${COPROC[1]}>&-"
> cat <&${COPROC[0]}
> wait $COPROC_PID
replace this with:
{ coproc prefix_timestamp >&3 ; } 3>&1
seq 10>&${COPROC[1]}
eval "exec ${COPROC[1]}>&-"
wait $COPROC_PID
this is how i do it now, thanks for the discussion.
Peter
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, (continued)
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pk, 2009/12/05
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pjodrr, 2009/12/06
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pk, 2009/12/06
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, Marc Herbert, 2009/12/07
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, Greg Wooledge, 2009/12/07
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, Marc Herbert, 2009/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, DennisW, 2009/12/07
- Message not available
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pjodrr, 2009/12/08
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, Marc Herbert, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pjodrr, 2009/12/08
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?,
pjodrr <=
- Message not available
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pk, 2009/12/07
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, Marc Herbert, 2009/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?, pjodrr, 2009/12/08