Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?

[pk]

Marc Herbert wrote:

>> pjodrr wrote:
>> It would be nice if you explained what it is you're attempting to do,
>> rather than ask for a solution for what you're thinking would do that.
> 
> To be honest that is the first thing he (tried to) do:
> 
> pjodrr wrote:
>> how can I prefix every line of output of some command with a
>> timestamp?

I disagree. All the further changes in the requirements because creating a 
subshell or being asynchronous is not acceptable etc. are not a goal in 
themselves, but rather the indicators that he's trying to accomplish 
something else.