Re: output redirection with process substitution asynchronous?

[pjodrr]

On Dec 8, 11:05 am, Marc Herbert <Marc.Herb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> pk a écrit :
>
>
>
> > I disagree. All the further changes in the requirements because creating a
> > subshell or being asynchronous is not acceptable etc. are not a goal in
> > themselves, but rather the indicators that he's trying to accomplish
> > something else.
>
> I think he just want side-effects like in this recent example from Chris:
>
> <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.shells.bash.bugs/13863/focus=13907>
>
> Granted: if he was explaining in greater detail which side-effects he wants,
> people might be able to suggest better alternatives.

I promise I'll do better the next time.

  Peter