[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?
From: |
E. Weddington |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems? |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 12:33:18 -0600 |
On 25 Jun 2004 at 10:46, Galen Seitz wrote:
> Bob Paddock <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > When reading the signature byte I usually get
> > odd signatures like this:
> >
> > 0x1e7f22
> > 0x003d00
> > 0x000102 (the most common, Atmel indicates this means the
> > device has been secured; it has not)
>
> I have no experience with the 2313 or pong-stk200, but I had a similiar
> problem with the mega48 and the stk500. I could not read the signature
> bytes reliably. It turned out that the SPI clock being used by the
> stk500 was higher than allowed by the default clock configuration of the
> mega48. I ended up patching avrdude to allow the stk500 spi clock to be
> set to a lower speed.
And that patch is still in the patch manager here:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3136>
- [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Bob Paddock, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, E. Weddington, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Bob Paddock, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Galen Seitz, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?,
E. Weddington <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Bob Paddock, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Galen Seitz, 2004/06/25
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2004/06/27
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Bob Paddock, 2004/06/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] ATtiny2313 and pony-stk200 problems?, Jan-Hinnerk Reichert, 2004/06/29