Re: [avr-libc-dev] io.h re-org

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Joerg Wunsch wrote:

> > The patch looks good, but it's too much at once. My plan (when I got
> > around to it) was to do something similar but in small, incremental
> > steps.
> 
> > It's a pain, but it makes review much easier. It's not much fun
> > trying to review a 2500 line diff and grok everything it does. ;-)
> 
> OK, another idea.  Instead of reviewing the 2500 line diff, just
> review the effect it has on compiled programs. :)
> 
> At least the technical correctness can be verified by comparing the
> preprocessor symbols resulting from the inclusion of <avr/io.h> before
> and after the change.  This can easily be automated by using avr-gcc
> -E -dM, run on a simple .S file that is almost empty except of the
> #include <avr/io.h> line.

Could we eventually agree on this issue?  I've proven technical
correctness of the patch, and i rather wouldn't like to have done
all this in vain.

-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/