Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] I fixed dtostre()

[Joerg Wunsch]

As E. Weddington wrote:

> Good idea. I was just looking up how IAR does it for their toolset. 
> They have 3 versions of (s)printf according to their docs:
> 1. Full-blown version.
> 2. Medium version: no floating point. %f, %g, %G, %e, %E specifiers 
> produce errors.
> 3. Small version: same as medium except supports only the %%, %d, %o, 
> %c, %s and %x specifiers for int objects, and does not support "field 
> width" and "precision" arguments.

I wonder how much difference in code size the last two options would
cause?

> IAR uses linker switches to switch between versions.

Do people feel using linker switches would be more practical than
selecting using a #define?

-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/