Re: [avr-libc-dev] interrupt enable functions

[Joerg Wunsch]

As Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:

> Well, I'm a bit swamped by a lot of mail.

Hmm, could imagine that.  I know that situation, although these days,
my email volume is not that high as it used to be once.

> The reason behind BV -> _BV was cleaner namespace (as you might expect),
> especially since the name is so short, and the macro is simple enough
> that you can define BV (or whatever name you choose) in your program.
> But I don't have a strong opinion on that, it's OK if you disagree :)

I can live with it, i only found it surprising that you eliminated
all the other names starting with an (or two) underscor(s) like __inw(),
while you added an underscore to BV().  But as you can see in the recent
FAQ entry, i'm already documenting the new name. ;-)
-- 
J"org Wunsch                                           Unix support engineer
address@hidden        http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/