[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug
|
From: |
Jan Waclawek |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:21:13 +0200 |
> For -O0 it works but upgrading to -Os makes the code non functional.
Indeed. The bug is present only with -O2, -O3 and -Os. -O0 and -O1 produces
stack frame of expected size...
I'd requalify it from "missed optimisation" to "pessimisation", then... :-)
Jan
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: Stack use - possible bug, (continued)
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug,
Jan Waclawek <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Colin O'Flynn, 2010/06/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09