[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:52:48 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Waclawek [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 7:49 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric; Dale; Paulo Marques
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug
>
>
> >Yes, I can agree to that, but I don't know if I could fully
> characterize =
> >this as a bug.
>
> Call it missed optimisation, then.
>
Certainly that's a better description.
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Colin O'Flynn, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09