[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug
|
From: |
Jan Waclawek |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:48:43 +0200 |
>Yes, I can agree to that, but I don't know if I could fully characterize =
>this as a bug.
Call it missed optimisation, then.
JW
----- Original Message ---------------
>> But you agree that there's stack used and never returned for reuse?
>>=20
>
>Yes, I can agree to that, but I don't know if I could fully characterize =
>this as a bug.
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, (continued)
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Dale, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug,
Jan Waclawek <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Wouter van Gulik, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Jan Waclawek, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Colin O'Flynn, 2010/06/09
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Paulo Marques, 2010/06/09
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Stack use - possible bug, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/09