[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15
|
From: |
Raphael Assenat |
|
Subject: |
Re: Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 11:11:15 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
On Monday 19 April 2004 10:47 am, Alexander Popov wrote:
> And one other issue - if the chip had not been erased, how would
> '-dvoltage=3' solve the problem with programming?!
yes, I agree that it would not make sense.
--
Regards,
Raphael Assenat
- [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Raphael Assenat, 2004/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re: Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, hanzl, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re[3]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re: Re[3]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, hanzl, 2004/04/19