[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15
From: |
Alexander Popov |
Subject: |
Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:47:42 +0300 |
Hello!
RA> I think the problem is that you do not erase it before reprogramming.
RA> Try :
RA> uisp -dprog=stk200 -dvoltage=5 --erase
RA> I hope this will help.
RA> Regards,
RA> Raphael assenat
No, I had erased the device before every test (in fact this is included in my
makefile, so no mistake was made).
But to be absolutely sure I checked if the chip was erased after every
command '--erase' - and yes, it was!
And one other issue - if the chip had not been erased, how would
'-dvoltage=3' solve the problem with programming?!
I still think it is the timing problem in UISP, but I don't know if
the program does not match the datasheet or the datasheet itseft
contains wrong timing.
--
Best regards,
Alexander Popov address@hidden
Master of Engineering
- [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Raphael Assenat, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15,
Alexander Popov <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re: Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, hanzl, 2004/04/19
- Re[2]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/04/19
- Re[3]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, Alexander Popov, 2004/04/19
- Re: Re[3]: [avr-gcc-list] UISP and ATtiny15, hanzl, 2004/04/19