[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
From: |
Sander Pool |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:51:03 -0700 |
OK, reason is two fold (for at least one vendor then):
- they want to protect their IP. Giving out driver source means the
competition gets it to. This is very competitive and every little hack that
makes their drivers better is an advantage.
- no perceived need to come up with a solution that would protect their IP
yet would allow application in arbitrary OSes. They can hardly keep up with
demand in the proprietary space (ie. Windows).
Sander
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jesper Hansen" <address@hidden>
To: "Sander Pool" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 1:14 PM
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
> Yes, but it's a fact.
> The Linux community (and me too), have seached for ages to find
documentationa
> and/or code for the huge number of existing cards. Prism is the only open
source
> driver at the moment.
> The companies are, for some obscure reason, reluctant (so say the least)
about
> leaving out ANY information about their cards.
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr, Johan Skoglund, 2003/10/03