[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
From: |
jr |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:56:05 -0400 |
I don't know if this is the reason in this specific case, but I think
that there may be some FCC concerns since many of the transmitters are
completely software controlled. (ie: frequency/power/etc)
This is the reason why there is currently no linux support for the
wireless card in my current thinkpad. Read more here:
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~andrewb/x31.html
Very unfortunate, there is just so much you'd be able to do with a nice
embedded processor hooked up to a small 802.11 card.
Take care,
-jr
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden
> On Behalf Of Jesper Hansen
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 4:15 PM
> To: Sander Pool; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
>
> Yes, but it's a fact.
> The Linux community (and me too), have seached for ages to find
> documentationa
> and/or code for the huge number of existing cards. Prism is the only
open
> source
> driver at the moment.
> The companies are, for some obscure reason, reluctant (so say the
least)
> about
> leaving out ANY information about their cards.
>
> Not just foolish, but plain stupid, as the Linux user base is growing
> quite large.
> Not to mention all the embedded systems that would be able to use the
> cards.
>
> /Jesper
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sander Pool" <address@hidden>
> To: <address@hidden>
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
>
>
> >
> > Sandisk wouldn't be interested in someone writing a driver for their
> card
> > even if it doens't mean they would sell a lot more?
> >
> > That would be rather foolish.
> >
> > Sander
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jesper Hansen" <address@hidden>
> > To: "Woodward, Mark P" <address@hidden>; "Jean-Francois
> Boutillon"
> > <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 10:50 AM
> > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr
> >
> >
> > > The problem is normally not the interface. It's to get the
> documentation
> > for the card !!
> > > The Prism II chipset is as fasr as I know the ONLY one that have a
> public
> > specification.
> > >
> > > Perhaps Sandisk have more sense than the other crazy companies
that
> > apparently don't
> > > see a market in embedded systems or Linux systems !
> > >
> > > /Jesper
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > avr-gcc-list mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> avr-gcc-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
Re: [avr-gcc-list] 802.11b on avr, Johan Skoglund, 2003/10/03