Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Mar 31 2012 21:10:42 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• March 31, 2012
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:10
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Russ Allbery, 21:00
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 20:50
  • Re: PROBLEM FOUND: automake issue -- make distcheck failure, Stefano Lattarini, 18:58
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Russ Allbery, 18:47
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Stefano Lattarini, 18:45
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Stefano Lattarini, 18:36
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Russ Allbery, 18:08
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 17:47
  • Re: PROBLEM FOUND: automake issue -- make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 17:21
  • Re: TAP support in automake, Russ Allbery, 17:04
  • Re: PROBLEM FOUND: automake issue -- make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 16:58
  • Re: make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 16:44
  • Re: TAP support in automake (was: Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length), Bob Friesenhahn, 16:24
  • TAP support in automake (was: Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length), Stefano Lattarini, 15:34
  • Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:15
  • Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 12:42
  • Re: make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 12:24
  • Re: automake 1.11.3 check-TESTS and command line length, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:16
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 07:38
  • Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 06:14
  • Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 05:08
  • Re: make distcheck failure, Stefano Lattarini, 04:34
  • Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 04:30
• March 30, 2012
  • Re: make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 18:19
• March 29, 2012
  • make distcheck failure, Bruce Korb, 19:37
• March 28, 2012
  • Re: Makefile ignores source, Harlan Stenn, 22:22
  • Makefile ignores source, Justin Findlay, 22:13
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Ian Lance Taylor, 19:46
  • Re: Automake 1.11.3b test release, Stefano Lattarini, 14:34
  • Re: Automake 1.11.3b test release, Stefano Lattarini, 14:32
  • Re: Automake 1.11.3b test release, Bob Friesenhahn, 14:19
  • Re: Automake 1.11.3b test release, Peter Rosin, 13:55
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 09:02
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Joseph S. Myers, 08:29
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 08:20
  • Re: bug#11089: LINK determination, Peter Breitenlohner, 07:31
  • Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Joseph S. Myers, 07:25
  • Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 06:05
• March 27, 2012
  • Re: bug#11089: LINK determination, Stefano Lattarini, 09:28
  • Re: python_PYTHON not triggering rules for generated code, Stefano Lattarini, 06:54
• March 26, 2012
  • Re: LINK determination, Jason DeVinney, 12:44
  • GSOC-2012 How to contribute some real code., drake01, 11:57
  • python_PYTHON not triggering rules for generated code, cb132, 11:57
• March 25, 2012
  • Re: LINK determination, Stefano Lattarini, 11:20
  • Automake 1.11.3b test release, Stefano Lattarini, 10:46
• March 22, 2012
  • LINK determination, Jason DeVinney, 23:54
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Nick Bowler, 10:03
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 09:30
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 08:38
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 04:01
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 03:51
• March 21, 2012
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:22
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Paul Elliott, 21:01
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 19:13
  • Problems with linking correct ldap library version, Manjesh HS, 18:20
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 13:02
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Bob Friesenhahn, 12:57
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 12:08
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 03:07
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 00:13
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 00:10
• March 20, 2012
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 23:11
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 21:33
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:16
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 20:32
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 19:56
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, NightStrike, 19:33
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Nick Bowler, 11:04
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Andrew W. Nosenko, 10:54
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Andrew W. Nosenko, 10:01
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Nick Bowler, 09:48
• March 19, 2012
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 22:37
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 22:10
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 21:40
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 21:38
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 21:35
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 21:18
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 21:07
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Harlan Stenn, 21:06
  • Re: dealing with executable shell scripts, Russ Allbery, 20:33
  • dealing with executable shell scripts, Miles Bader, 18:00
• March 18, 2012
  • Releasing automake 1.11.4, Stefano Lattarini, 15:29
• March 16, 2012
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"?, Stefano Lattarini, 18:05
• March 15, 2012
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"?, Stefano Lattarini, 16:04
• March 13, 2012
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"? (was: Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool: fix imprecise comments), Bob Friesenhahn, 13:45
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"? (was: Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool: fix imprecise comments), Bruno Haible, 12:47
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"?, Eric Blake, 11:11
  • Re: should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"?, Robert Boehne, 10:56
  • should an empty "pkgdata_DATA" cause creation of $(pkgdatadir) by "make install"? (was: Re: [PATCH] gnulib-tool: fix imprecise comments), Stefano Lattarini, 08:31
• March 11, 2012
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:31
• March 10, 2012
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Andrey Volkov, 17:08
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 14:19
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 13:46
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Sam Varshavchik, 13:08
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 12:43
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 12:33
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Stefano Lattarini, 02:54
• March 09, 2012
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Sam Varshavchik, 23:12
  • Re: [rfc] Antimake, Miles Bader, 21:00
  • [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 19:46
• March 02, 2012
  • touching dependency files, take 2, Bruce Korb, 20:18
  • Re: Manual dependency: specifying config.h on Automake.am, Stefano Lattarini, 14:52
• March 01, 2012
  • Manual dependency: specifying config.h on Automake.am, Fabrício Zimmerer Murta, 09:22

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc