[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:38:34 +0200 |
On 03/28/2012 02:19 PM, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Hi Joseph, thanks for the feedback.
> On 03/28/2012 01:24 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>>
>> Is there better transition documentation somewhere?
>>
> Nope, but it would be a good idea to prepare it before starting to deprecate
> the 'cygnus' option. Maybe even for 1.12. Thanks for the suggestion.
>
Or even for 1.11.4, which is to be released in two/three days. What about the
attached patch? I will push it by this evening if there is no objection.
Thanks,
Stefano
0001-docs-deprecate-cygnus-mode-help-the-transition.patch
Description: Text Data
- Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/28
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Joseph S. Myers, 2012/03/28
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/28
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Ian Lance Taylor, 2012/03/28
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2012/03/31
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31
- Re: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/03/31