Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Jan 31 2011 15:29:25 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• January 31, 2011
  • Re: Makefile.am and xxx_LDFLAGS seems not working, Pauli Sundberg, 15:29
  • Re: Makefile.am and xxx_LDFLAGS seems not working, Stefano Lattarini, 11:59
  • Makefile.am and xxx_LDFLAGS seems not working, Pauli Sundberg, 11:24
• January 30, 2011
  • Re: dashes in Makefile macro names, Stefano Lattarini, 08:42
  • Re: dashes in Makefile macro names, Ralf Wildenhues, 04:57
• January 29, 2011
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 06:08
• January 28, 2011
  • Re: dashes in Makefile macro names, Stefano Lattarini, 15:55
  • Re: dashes in Makefile macro names, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:23
  • Re: make test with fortran program, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:43
  • Re: make test with fortran program, Eve-Marie Devaliere, 14:29
  • Re: dashes in Makefile macro names, Eric Blake, 10:04
  • Re: make test with fortran program, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:41
• January 27, 2011
  • Re: make test with fortran program, Eve-Marie Devaliere, 13:55
  • Re: Conditional target, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:41
  • Re: make test with fortran program, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:24
  • make test with fortran program, Eve-Marie Devaliere, 13:22
  • Re: Conditional target, Sergio Belkin, 07:16
  • Re: Conditional target, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:08
• January 26, 2011
  • Re: Conditional target, Dave Hart, 23:50
  • Conditional target, Sergio Belkin, 22:40
• January 25, 2011
  • Re: automake-1.11: no `Makefile.am' found for any configure output, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:24
  • automake-1.11: no `Makefile.am' found for any configure output, Brian J. Murrell, 09:26
  • Re: texinfo files in sub directories, Thomas Keller, 04:32
  • Re: texinfo files in sub directories, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:04
• January 24, 2011
  • texinfo files in sub directories, Thomas Keller, 18:36
  • Re: support for a program that compile files (like yacc or lex support), Vincent Torri, 04:09
• January 23, 2011
  • Re: LDFLAGS for EXTRA_PROGRAMS, Peter Johansson, 20:25
  • LDFLAGS for EXTRA_PROGRAMS, Sergio Belkin, 17:46
  • turning off dependency tracking when building fat binaries on Mac OSX, Peter Johansson, 04:24
• January 20, 2011
  • Re: Probem with docdir sudirectory, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:57
  • Re: Probem with docdir sudirectory, Sergio Belkin, 13:36
  • Re: Probem with docdir sudirectory, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:11
  • Re: Probem with docdir sudirectory, Marcelo Zimbres, 10:01
  • Probem with docdir sudirectory, Sergio Belkin, 09:39
• January 18, 2011
  • Re: bug reports, and lack of feedback (was: make -j1 fails), Dave Hart, 14:49
  • more bug economics (was: bug#7648: ylwrap appears not to support bison's lalr1.cc skeleton), Ralf Wildenhues, 14:45
  • bug reports, and lack of feedback (was: make -j1 fails), Ralf Wildenhues, 14:31
  • Re: make -j1 fails, Dave Hart, 03:49
• January 17, 2011
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 14:10
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Paul Smith, 12:31
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 11:28
• January 16, 2011
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Dave Hart, 14:42
  • Re: Avoid VPATH-related distcheck failures with non-GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 12:32
  • Re: Avoid VPATH-related distcheck failures with non-GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 11:00
  • Re: Avoid VPATH-related distcheck failures with non-GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 10:40
  • Re: Avoid VPATH-related distcheck failures with non-GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:41
• January 15, 2011
  • Re: Avoid VPATH-related distcheck failures with non-GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 10:51
• January 14, 2011
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Miles Bader, 20:52
  • hello kkkkkkkkkg, Carl Fürstenberg, 19:58
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Paul Smith, 18:09
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:58
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:55
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:39
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:35
  • Re: make -j1 fails, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:27
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 13:22
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 10:04
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 08:14
  • Re: make -j1 fails, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 03:38
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:49
• January 13, 2011
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, NightStrike, 23:12
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Paul Smith, 15:34
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 15:15
  • Re: High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Harlan Stenn, 15:00
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Guido Draheim, 14:55
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Roger Leigh, 14:55
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Paul Smith, 14:53
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Guido Draheim, 14:45
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 14:40
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:38
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:34
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 14:32
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Guido Draheim, 14:25
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 14:04
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:59
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 13:50
  • Re: make -j1 fails, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:22
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Guido Draheim, 12:20
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 09:52
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 09:44
  • Re: High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Eric Reischer, 09:29
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Юрий Пухальский, 08:27
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 07:37
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 07:02
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 06:56
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Юрий Пухальский, 03:47
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:29
  • make -j1 fails, Pippijn van Steenhoven, 03:24
• January 12, 2011
  • Re: High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Miles Bader, 23:47
  • Re: High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:58
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:39
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Bob Friesenhahn, 21:29
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Peter O'Gorman, 21:27
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Miles Bader, 19:26
  • Re: High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Eric Blake, 17:30
  • High-Precision NFS Timestamps, Eric Reischer, 17:08
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 16:38
  • Re: autoreconf/automake w/out autoheader, Stefano Lattarini, 16:19
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Xochitl Lunde, 16:16
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 16:14
  • autoreconf/automake w/out autoheader, Jason Kraftcheck, 16:08
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 15:59
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 14:31
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:23
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:20
  • Re: [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Steffen Dettmer, 13:16
  • [CRAZY PROPOSAL] Automake should support only GNU make, Stefano Lattarini, 13:02
• January 10, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 09:13
• January 09, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 03:10
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:26
• January 08, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 17:42
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Paul Smith, 17:27
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 15:59
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:42
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 14:30
• January 07, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 13:45
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 07:35
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:31
• January 06, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Bob Friesenhahn, 22:37
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Bob Friesenhahn, 22:27
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 19:13
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Miles Bader, 18:51
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 18:34
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 18:26
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Miles Bader, 18:26
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 18:18
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 17:08
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 09:04
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 02:43
• January 05, 2011
  • Re: Dependency problem (with win32 resource file and generated header), Jef Driesen, 12:02
  • Re: How to install library in a specify directory?, Ralf Corsepius, 02:15
  • How to install library in a specify directory?, Lyre, 02:08
  • Re: Dependency problem (with win32 resource file and generated header), Ralf Wildenhues, 01:38
• January 04, 2011
  • Dependency problem (with win32 resource file and generated header), Jef Driesen, 15:54
  • Re: Automake and AR, NightStrike, 15:20
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 15:11
  • Re: comments in make variable definition, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:02
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 15:01
  • Re: Automake and AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 14:50
  • Re: Automake and AR, Ralf Corsepius, 13:25
  • Re: Automake and AR, NightStrike, 13:18
  • Re: Automake and AR, Peter Rosin, 13:10
  • Re: Automake and AR, NightStrike, 10:23
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 08:47
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 08:21
  • Re: support for a program that compile files (like yacc or lex support), Vincent Torri, 02:25
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Ralf Wildenhues, 01:56
  • Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan, 01:45
• January 03, 2011
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 20:57
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Miles Bader, 20:48
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 20:22
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Miles Bader, 19:57
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 18:54
  • Re: Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Eric Blake, 18:46
  • Any way to get rid of -MP parameter to gcc for dependency creation?, Xan Lopez, 18:43
• January 02, 2011
  • Re: How to develop an autobuild script, kknd1233, 16:15
• January 01, 2011
  • Happy GNU Year, Adrienne Thompson, 12:32

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc