automake-ng
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 5/6] [ng] $(am__newline): will not be stripped


From: Dave Hart
Subject: Re: [Automake-NG] [PATCH 5/6] [ng] $(am__newline): will not be stripped unexpectedly
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 00:03:36 +0000

On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 20:40 UTC, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> Not even if placed at the end of another macro's expansion.
>
> * lib/am/header-vars.am (am__newline): Improve definition, and
> update comments.
> * t/internals.sh: Update: some previously xfailing checks are
> now passing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Lattarini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  lib/am/header-vars.am |    4 +++-
>  t/internals.tap       |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/am/header-vars.am b/lib/am/header-vars.am
> index d7afe6f..49b0ddb 100644
> --- a/lib/am/header-vars.am
> +++ b/lib/am/header-vars.am
> @@ -50,9 +50,11 @@ am__dquote := "
>  am__squote := '
>  # "` # Fix font-lock.
>
> +# A literlan newline character, that does not get stripped if used

s/literlan/literal/ and also the comma should be removed.

> +# at the end of the expansion of another macro.
>  define am__newline
>
> -
> +$(am__empty)
>  endef
>
>  ## Makefiles generated by Automake-NG require GNU make >= 3.81.
> diff --git a/t/internals.tap b/t/internals.tap
> index 1012be6..c94163c 100755
> --- a/t/internals.tap
> +++ b/t/internals.tap
> @@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ command_ok_  am__tolower                $MAKE test-tolower
>  command_ok_  am__toupper                $MAKE test-toupper
>  command_ok_  am__canon                  $MAKE test-canonicalize
>  command_ok_  "am__newline (1)"          $MAKE test-newline-1
> -command_ok_  "am__newline (2)"          $MAKE test-newline-2
> -command_ok_  "am__newline (3)"          $MAKE test-newline-3
> +command_ok_  "am__newline (2)" -D TODO  $MAKE test-newline-2
> +command_ok_  "am__newline (3)" -D TODO  $MAKE test-newline-3
>
>  :
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
>

Cheers,
Dave Hart



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]