[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ fix and test
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: C++ fix and test |
Date: |
21 Dec 2000 23:26:51 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
On Dec 20, 2000, Raja R Harinath <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Dec 20, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Why do you want to try without stdlib.h?
>>
>> Because stdlib.h may not be safe for multiple inclusion, and the
>> user test may already #include it.
> I don't think so. AFAIK, stdlib.h was introduced in ISO C90 (also
> known as ANSI C89). That standard was pretty specific that the
> standard headers should be multiple inclusion safe.
Note that you're talking about Standards, while I'm talking about the
real world.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: C++ fix and test, (continued)
- Re: C++ fix and test, Pavel Roskin, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Mo DeJong, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/21
- Re: C++ fix and test, Raja R Harinath, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test,
Alexandre Oliva <=
RE: C++ fix and test, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/12/21