[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ fix and test
From: |
Raja R Harinath |
Subject: |
Re: C++ fix and test |
Date: |
20 Dec 2000 11:06:35 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.0.93 |
Hi,
Alexandre Oliva <address@hidden> writes:
> On Dec 20, 2000, Akim Demaille <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Why do you want to try without stdlib.h?
>
> Because stdlib.h may not be safe for multiple inclusion, and the
> user test may already #include it.
I don't think so. AFAIK, stdlib.h was introduced in ISO C90 (also
known as ANSI C89). That standard was pretty specific that the
standard headers should be multiple inclusion safe.
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ address@hidden
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
- Re: C++ fix and test, (continued)
- Re: C++ fix and test, Pavel Roskin, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Mo DeJong, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/21
- Re: C++ fix and test,
Raja R Harinath <=
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/21
RE: C++ fix and test, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/12/21