[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ fix and test
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: C++ fix and test |
Date: |
21 Dec 2000 23:26:18 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
On Dec 20, 2000, Mo DeJong <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think the default should be to support working systems and
> then add workarounds for the "known broken" ones.
That's the reason why the first option in my list of alternatives to
get a declaration for exit() was `#include <stdlib.h>'. If that
doesn't work, we get to look for a declaration of exit() that works
with it.
> Sure, you could go adding an exit() proto but you
> could also just leave it up to the user to include
> or not include <stdlib.h> in the test they write.
The problem is that there are a number of tests in autoconf that call
exit() regardless of what the user code is. Since we need a solution
for these tests, why not make it general?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: C++ fix and test, (continued)
- Re: C++ fix and test, Pavel Roskin, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Akim Demaille, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Assar Westerlund, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Mo DeJong, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: C++ fix and test, Raja R Harinath, 2000/12/20
- Re: C++ fix and test, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/12/21
RE: C++ fix and test, Bernard Dautrevaux, 2000/12/21