[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Optimization for install-sh
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: Optimization for install-sh |
Date: |
10 Nov 2000 15:20:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <address@hidden> writes:
Lars> I wasn'rt talking about the if-blocks that was used with &&
Lars> operators, I was talking about the redundant if/else blocks
Lars> (excuse the un-related while-loop compacting on top):
Sorry Lars, I missed those. That's the sort of thing you need if you
`set -e' your script, but this script has no reason to be. So I OK
your patch. But really people, I don't think install-sh deserves this
attention. Still, I do understand the pleasure of finding a new
sand box :)
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, (continued)
Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Message not available
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10
- Re: Optimization for install-sh,
Akim Demaille <=
Re: Optimization for install-sh, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/10
Re: Optimization for install-sh, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/10
Re: Optimization for install-sh, Lars J. Aas, 2000/11/10