[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers... |
Date: |
Mon, 09 May 2005 14:33:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> writes:
> * David Kastrup (2005-05-09) writes:
>
>> After thinking this over, I have decided that the sanest course is
>> to release "standalone" versions of preview-latex with the version
>> numbers from AUCTeX. It makes clear what versions belong together
>> and are more up-to-date than whatever else. It also means that
>> version 0.9.2 will not be released at all, but rather be 11.80.
>
> That means the AUCTeX and preview-latex releases will be
> synchronized?
Yes.
> For example if there is change in preview-latex only, which requires
> a new release, this will mean a new AUCTeX release as well?
I think so.
> What happens if AUCTeX is not in a releasable state in this
> situation? Hm, one could probably use the last working state for
> this.
If things come to worst, we have to branch for a release. Like all
projects with parts in different flux do.
>> What do people think with regard to tarballs: should we release
>> preview-latex tarballs at all any more? I think it will probably
>> give a more sane message if we only provide AUCTeX tarballs: the
>> only people that should be interested in preview-latex-only are
>> some sort of package providers, and those should be able to survive
>> the additional download. And they should probably provide AUCTeX,
>> anyway.
>
> If you don't provide tarballs, what exactly is a "standalone"
> release of preview-latex then?
Who is talking about standalone releases? I was just saying that I
would want to stop them completely. A standalone compilation, on the
other hand, is one started from within the preview directory. It
leads to code/packages/documentation that makes sense even when
combined with different AUCTeX versions. Yet.
>> Another thing I am wondering about is FAQ/README/INSTALL/whatever
>> for preview-latex. Take a look at the current distribution
>> directory on ftp.gnu.org. What is the most sensible place/naming
>> for them?
>
> I'd set up a separate directory for each AUCTeX or prevew-latex
> release. The main directory is already too crowded.
Uh, we already have a separate directory for extra stuff related to
separate releases. The main tarballs are different though: pretty
much every project on ftp.gnu.org distributes them from the main
directory.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers...,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09