[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers...
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers... |
Date: |
Mon, 09 May 2005 10:43:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
After thinking this over, I have decided that the sanest course is to
release "standalone" versions of preview-latex with the version
numbers from AUCTeX. It makes clear what versions belong together and
are more up-to-date than whatever else. It also means that version
0.9.2 will not be released at all, but rather be 11.80.
What do people think with regard to tarballs: should we release
preview-latex tarballs at all any more? I think it will probably give
a more sane message if we only provide AUCTeX tarballs: the only
people that should be interested in preview-latex-only are some sort
of package providers, and those should be able to survive the
additional download. And they should probably provide AUCTeX, anyway.
Another thing I am wondering about is FAQ/README/INSTALL/whatever for
preview-latex. Take a look at the current distribution directory on
ftp.gnu.org. What is the most sensible place/naming for them?
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers...,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., Ralf Angeli, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: Version numbers..., David Kastrup, 2005/05/09