Re: [Sks-devel] Fwd: Re: sks (fast)build memory/cache problem

[Jeffrey Johnson]

On Jul 2, 2012, at 8:32 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <address@hidden> wrote:

On 2012-07-02 14:27, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:

On Jul 2, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:

This is rarely necessary and should be done only when the
        default configuration selects the wrong mutex implementation.

Is Gentoo3 or Gentoo4 selecting the wrong mutex implementation?

I really don't know what implementation it would've chosen :) As I said, this was a default build using the ebuild from portage in gentoo, now that I know that its working with that it is time to start playing with some of the variables involved.

I do, however, agree that it is curious that it default to this setting, as for why you'll have to ask the gentoo maintainer.

Understood. I just wanted to point out alternatives and perhaps

with some context for making choices. There's a lot of hysteria

around.

Ultimately you can build BDB however you want and -- if/when BDB breaks --

blame Sunacle (there's a *lot* of "Berkeley DB Haters" around everywhere).

hth

73 de Jeff