[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?
From: |
Adam Weremczuk |
Subject: |
Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2024 12:32:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
Similar issue on 2.2.2-1:
/usr/bin/rdiff-backup --remove-older-than 8W --force
some_server::some_path/rdiff/
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
WARNING: this command line interface is deprecated and will disappear,
start using the new one as described with '--new --help'.
WARNING: No increment is older than '8W'
WARNING: Action remove emitted warnings, see previous messages for details
NOTE: No increments older than Thu Jan 25 21:42:19 2024 found, exiting.
I've tried replacing it with:
/usr/bin/rdiff-backup --api-version 201 remove --remove-older-than 8W
--force some_server::some_path/rdiff/
usage: rdiff-backup remove [-h] {increments} ...
rdiff-backup remove: error: argument entity: invalid choice: '8W'
(choose from 'increments')
How should my command look like?
On 03/03/2024 14:02, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 3/2/24 15:05, qx6uwumzvv@liamekaens.com wrote:
Yesterday I did my quarterly update of the software on 3 virtual
machines running debian/testing and rdiff-backup was updated from
2.2.2-1 to 2.2.6-1.
Today when I looked at the log output from my nightly backup scripts
emailed to me from these machines, I see that every invocation of
rdiff-backup is now producing the message:
WARNING: Server will be called with deprecated command line interface
to guarantee compatibility. It might lead to a deprecation warning
from newer rdiff-backup versions. Use '--api-version 201' (or higher)
to avoid it.
See https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/922
Should be fixed when version 2.4 is released. For the time being, just
modify your scripts to add the "--api-version 201" option.
- Spurious "deprecated" warning?, qx6uwumzvv, 2024/03/02
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, Robert Nichols, 2024/03/03
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?,
Adam Weremczuk <=
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, Robert Nichols, 2024/03/22
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, Adam Weremczuk, 2024/03/22
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, EricZolf, 2024/03/22
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, Adam Weremczuk, 2024/03/23
- Re: Spurious "deprecated" warning?, EricZolf, 2024/03/23