[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:03:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Digging into simple.el, the only difference I could find between
> asynchronous and interactive shell buffers is that the former have
> process sentinels associated with them when they're running; after they
> finish, they of course have no process at all. That led me to write:
Indeed, there are very few differences between them. Another way to
distinguish them is to look at the buffer's history: if you never type
in async-shell-command buffers, then the input history should be empty
in those buffers. E.g. maybe checking (eq (point-min)
comint-last-input-start) will do the trick.
Another way is to check (string-match "Async" (buffer-name)).
Stefan
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers, Sean McAfee, 2011/02/22
- Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers,
Stefan Monnier <=