[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers
From: |
Perry Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:50:39 -0600 |
On Feb 21, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Sean McAfee wrote:
> Barry Margolin <barmar@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>> In article <m2y65ajluo.fsf@gmail.com>, Sean McAfee <eefacm@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> What's the best way to distinguish asynchronous shell command buffers
>>> from interactive shell buffers?
>
>> Why not just look for the buffer named "*shell*"?
>
> Because I often have multiple shell buffers open--none of which are
> necessarily named "*shell*"--and I only want to target the
> most-recently-accessed one.
mode-name ?
It would be "Shell" for things started with "shell" and "Fundamental" for
things done with shell-command
Re: Distinguishing between interactive and asynchronous shell buffers, Sean McAfee, 2011/02/22