Re: [ft] Minimal TTF implementation

[Wojciech Mamrak]

why not to go even further? :)

//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t1_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, cff_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t1cid_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, pfr_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t42_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, winfnt_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, pcf_driver_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Module_Class, psaux_module_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Module_Class, psnames_module_class )
//theoretically needed, but seems to work well without it
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Module_Class, pshinter_module_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Renderer_Class, ft_smooth_lcdv_renderer_class )
//FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, bdf_driver_class )

2013/8/16 Iñaki Castillo Arteta <address@hidden>:
> I have removed the following modules(see below), and now the compiled library 
> is 285KB, instead of 320KB.
> It is 35KB less. Not bad, but not as much as I would expect considering I 
> have dropped support for a lot of font types.
> I understand TTF support may take the most part of the library, but is it 
> possible to reduce it even further?.
>
> By the way, how can I remove selectively the support for OTF fonts ?
>
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t1_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, cff_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t1cid_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, pfr_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, t42_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, winfnt_driver_class )
> //FT_USE_MODULE( FT_Driver_ClassRec, pcf_driver_class )
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden En nombre de Wojciech Mamrak
> Enviado el: viernes, 16 de agosto de 2013 16:53
> Para: Iñaki Castillo Arteta
> CC: address@hidden
> Asunto: Re: [ft] Minimal TTF implementation
>
> Also I've been successful with disabling optional (yet theoretically needed 
> by truetype module) psnames module (without any modifications in ftoption.h).
>
> I would be also interested whether it is possible to decrease executable's 
> size even more.
>
> 2013/8/16 Wojciech Mamrak <address@hidden>:
>> See files docs/CUSTOMIZE, docs/INSTALL.ANY and modules.cfg.
>>
>>
>>
>> 2013/8/16 Iñaki Castillo Arteta <address@hidden>:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Which is the minimal footprint I should expect for a Freetype
>>> implementation that manages only TTF fonts ?
>>>
>>> Currently my implementation takes 320KB which is compiled with,
>>> almost, all default settings (except Mac font support).
>>>
>>> I would like to reduce the library as much as possible in size, while
>>> preserving  TTF rendering (with antialiasing and subpixel).
>>>
>>> Is there an example about how to customize compilation settings to
>>> achieve something like this ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> Inaki.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetype mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
>>>