[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Oversized "O"
From: |
Hanno Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Oversized "O" |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 18:12:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050912) |
Anton Zemlyanov schrieb:
> You should probably know that TT fonts have special "fitting" or
> "hinting" process that uses byte interpreter to improve the quality of
> small fonts. Unfortunately this works good for monochrome fonts only
By email, you requested a screenshot from a Windows system and as I
already wrote you there, it seems to me that Windows is not using
monochrome rendering as you guessed, but subpixel aliasing for this
font size, as well:
Windows: http://www.hanno.de/kram/big-o-windows-zoom.png
Linux/X: http://www.hanno.de/kram/big-o-zoom.png
> (MS seems to never use anti-aliasing for small font sizes).
So far, I was under the impression that the "Core Fonts" once freely
distributed by MS were optimized for screen reading incl. good aliasing
for small font sizes.
> I found that anti-aliasing is not very beautiful for small font sizes
True, aliased fonts do look a bit "off" in Windows. Freetype's
subpixel-aliasing is looking much better to me than the one used by Windows.
But my main gripe is the hardware resolution. I wish there were
higher-resolution desktop TFT displays than the standard 1280x1024
displays one can buy these days. Some laptops already use 1600x1200
displays and there, subpixel-aliasing looks really nice. The higher the
dpi resolution of the TFT, the more impressive the effect.
Best regards,
Hanno