[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2 changes required for XFree86
|
From: |
Brian Stell |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2 changes required for XFree86 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 04 Apr 2002 09:36:30 -0800 |
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> ...
> 2. Structure member names
>
> Because things like ``read'' are actually #defines in XFree86 codes,
Defining common names like ''read'' always leads to problems
when using multiple packages.
Why doesn't XFree86 follow common C protocol and use uppercase?
Better yet, why not use a name like XF86_READ to avoid conflicts
on such common names?
Brian Stell