[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful)
From: |
James Michael DuPont |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful) |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Feb 2003 01:10:51 -0800 (PST) |
--- Fergus Henderson <address@hidden> wrote:
> .custom
> (['mscorlib']'System.Runtime.CompilerServices'.'AssemblyAttributes
> GoHere') instance void
> ['mscorlib']'System.Diagnostics'.'DebuggableAttribute'::.ctor(bool,
> bool) = ( 01 00 01 01 00 00 )
>
> You can probably just define AssemblyAttributes as an empty class
> and DebuggableAttribute as an empty class (or maybe a 6-byte struct)
> with the specified "void (bool, bool)" constructor.
That was one of the test cases i reported in my mail.
Even if all the classes are defined, you get a bug.
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Gopal V, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Fergus Henderson, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Gopal V, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Fergus Henderson, 2003/02/27
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Fergus Henderson, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful),
James Michael DuPont <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), James Michael DuPont, 2003/02/28
- Re: [DotGNU]Mercury on Portable.NET (not successful), Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/27