[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Mandrake RPMs release procedure (was Re: Comments Wanted: Re
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Mandrake RPMs release procedure (was Re: Comments Wanted: Release Check List) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 19:03:22 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Monday 10 February 2003 05:03 pm, Stephen Compall wrote:
> The following is done in XHTML, to be completely pedantic. Hope you can
> read it.
I've added it to the Web site, as-is for the time being (I'll clean it up
later once all the content is available).
http://www.southern-storm.com.au/checklist.html
> <li>Change `Version: @VERSION@' to `Version: 0.2.2', with `0.2.2' being
> whatever the version triplet is for this release. Change `Release: ...'
> to `Release: 1mdk'. If the RPM turns out bad, you'll do another one
> with `2mdk', etc. Probably the first one will be fine though. WARNING:
> the treecc version numbers are <em>different</em> than the pnet version
> numbers.</li>
Can't we do this automatically from "configure.in" instead of requiring manual
intervention? That would seem to be a better solution. Similarly with the
other changes to treecc.spec.in.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- [DotGNU]Comments Wanted: Release Check List, Rhys Weatherley, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Comments Wanted: Release Check List, Rainer Groesslinger, 2003/02/08
- Re: [DotGNU]Comments Wanted: Release Check List, Gopal V, 2003/02/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Comments Wanted: Release Check List, Robert Johnson, 2003/02/09
- [DotGNU]Mandrake RPMs release procedure (was Re: Comments Wanted: Release Check List), Stephen Compall, 2003/02/10
- Re: [DotGNU]Mandrake RPMs release procedure (was Re: Comments Wanted: Release Check List),
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Comments Wanted: Release Check List, Timothy Rue, 2003/02/13