[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:18:43 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: 69739@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:09:11 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii [2024-03-15 13:50:56] wrote:
> > Should we document this new function in the ELisp manual?
>
> I was thinking that we should do that only when/if we demote `type-of`
> (`(cl-)type-of` is an operation that's used very rarely, so I think it's
> best to keep it to a minimum in the manual),
> Of course, the name also begs the question whether it should be in the
> ELisp manual or in the CL manual.
>
> In a previous version of the patch I had it documented alongside
> `type-of`, so I can easily dig that up if you think it's best.
Yes, I think we should document it near type-of, as the explanation
when and why to prefer cl-type-of is quite simple and easily
understandable.
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, (continued)
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/13
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/14
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/17
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/18
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/18
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15