[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough
|
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
|
Subject: |
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:51:33 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Stefan Monnier [2024-03-14 12:56 -0400] wrote:
> I ended up with `cl-type-of` as the name of the new function (after
> all, it tries to better match the expected semantics of Common Lisp's
> `type-of`).
>
> Comments? Objections?
No objections here, just one question: did you consider extending
type-of with an optional argument instead of introducing cl-type-of?
Or would that be too messy?
Thanks,
--
Basil
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, (continued)
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/13
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/14
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough,
Basil L. Contovounesios <=
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/17
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/18
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/18
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15