[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough
From: |
Andrea Corallo |
Subject: |
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Mar 2024 06:54:36 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Andrea Corallo <acorallo@gnu.org> writes:
> Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of
> text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> OK, here's a new patch.
>> I ended up with `cl-type-of` as the name of the new function (after
>> all, it tries to better match the expected semantics of Common Lisp's
>> `type-of`).
>>
>> Comments? Objections?
>
> FWIW: I think this is a good change and agree `cl-type-of` is a good
> name for the new function. I'm just wondering if we should have some
> test this.
^^^
to cover
Andrea
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, (continued)
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/12
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/13
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/14
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Andrea Corallo, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough,
Andrea Corallo <=
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/17
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/18
- bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Stefan Monnier, 2024/03/18
bug#69739: 30.0.50; `type-of` is not precise enough, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/15