[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 09:52:52 +0200 |
> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 02:51:42 +0100
> From: Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> C-h f apply says:
>
> | ...
> | With a single argument, call the argument's first element using the
> | other elements as args.
>
> Issue 1: This doc sentence has to be moved after the following example,
> because that example:
>
> | Thus, (apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4)) returns 10.
>
> is an example for the more widespread syntax.
>
> That sentence actually explains a special case: it tells that this is
> also allowed:
>
> (apply '(+ 1 2)) ==> 3
>
>
> Issue 2: The byte compiler currently miscompiles such expressions:
>
> Expected:
>
> (funcall (lambda () (apply '(+ 1 2)))) ==> 3
>
> but
>
> (funcall (byte-compile '(lambda () (apply '(+ 1 2)))))
> ~~> Error: Invalid function: (+ 1 2)
>
> AFAIU this is `byte-optimize-apply's fault:
>
> (byte-optimize-apply '(apply '(+ 1 2)))
> ==> (funcall '(+ 1 2) '+ '1 '2) ; Ouch!
>
Stefan and Mattias, any comments or suggestions?
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, (continued)
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Andreas Schwab, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Mattias Engdegård, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Drew Adams, 2024/03/04
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax,
Eli Zaretskii <=