[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Mar 2024 08:46:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Michael Heerdegen [2024-03-04 06:13 +0100] wrote:
> Michael Heerdegen <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> (byte-optimize-apply '(apply '(+ 1 2)))
>> ==> (funcall '(+ 1 2) '+ '1 '2) ; Ouch!
>
> I'm adding Mattias to the discussion - he had changed
> `byte-optimize-apply' after this new convention (which I find
> irritating, too) had been introduced.
Just curious: which convention are you referring to, and why do you say
it's new? AFAICT the only recent Emacs version which accepted
(apply '(+ 1 2)) without any complaint is Emacs 28.
> I guess since byte compilation of such forms is (at least partly)
> broken, not many people are actually using it.
FWIW, my guilty pleasure is using this calling convention with
a non-literal form, e.g.:
(define-advice foo (:around (&rest args) my-foo)
(with-something (apply args)))
This has always byte-compiled without issue.
Of course, I'm not married to this convention.
Thanks,
--
Basil
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/03/03
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Drew Adams, 2024/03/03
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Michael Heerdegen, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Andreas Schwab, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Mattias EngdegÄrd, 2024/03/04
- bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Drew Adams, 2024/03/04
bug#69533: 30.0.50; Wrong byte compilation of a certain apply syntax, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/14