[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for te
From: |
Konstantin Kharlamov |
Subject: |
bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:53:50 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.50.4 |
On Thu, 2024-03-14 at 09:33 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> If you ignore doc strings in Emacs, you are making a mistake, IMO. I
> believe many/most users do consult the doc strings, and I urge you to
> teach yourself to look there, not just in the manuals. The manuals
> don't (and cannot) cover all the public variables and functions,
> whereas the doc strings can and do.
I don't "ignore doc strings in Emacs", that is impossible to do because
you have to consult at least function docs to customize, fix problems,
etc 😊 Instead I ignore specifically major mode documentation and I'd
be surprised if too many other people read it. You see, documentation
should be intuitive. A user asks a question "how to do X", the answer
intuitively should be "search docs for X". If you ask "why my
customizations to term-mode-map do not work?", the answer would be
"look at term-mode-map docs, perhaps it mentions something".
Similarly, by intuition, if I ask myself "what docs do I expect the
`term-mode` to have", I'd reply "General information about the mode,
i.e. that it launches a terminal and maybe a reference to shell and
eshell alternatives". I'd not expect my problem with the not working
keybindings to be mentioned in term-mode doc-string (even if it is
actually there).
> > I see that major mode docs may sometimes also describe keybindings
>
> I wasn't talking about the key bindings, I was talking about the
> specific quirk of this mode: that it has several distinct keymaps
> instead of just one. This is somewhat unusual, and thus deserves to
> be called out in the doc string of the mode, since the maps belong to
> the mode. (Each of the maps has its own doc string that explains its
> purpose, but that is not enough because those doc strings are not
> easily discoverable. Mentioning the maps in the doc string of the
> mode will close the gap.)
Okay then, I'll add docs to the `term-mode` if you think it might be
useful for someone and (re: the other email) to `term-mode-map` and
`term-raw-map` variables 😊
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/03/13
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/14
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/03/14
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/14
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode,
Konstantin Kharlamov <=
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/14
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/03/16
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/03/16
- bug#69786: [PATCH] docs: mention the keymap to add keybindings to for term-mode, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2024/03/16